In the short story "A Rose For Emily", the plot was what I would compare to a popcorn plot, it hops around a lot, not being told by the author William Faulkner, in a chronological order that some stories are usually portrayed with. This made this story stand out to me. Litcharts also pointed out that the "narrative quickly shifts back in time", this is made obvious when first begging to read this story as it starts talking about Emily's funeral, then the pieces of the story are told in an extreme time-hop/warp manner. This first sentence, "When Miss Emily Grierson died, our whole town went to her funeral..." at this point we have no clue who Emily is and of course the narrator fills in with the detail later for us to gain a better understanding, but keep the surprise factor.
why talk of beauty what could be more beaut- iful than these heroic happy dead This is an example of irony, because it says "what could be more beautiful than these heroic happy dead", and to me that sounds like its generalizing all that are dead are happy. Followed by the next line saying " who rushed like lions to the roaring slaughter", how could anyone rushing to their own slaughter be a happy death, heroic yes. Happy, no. No one wants to die, but I guess it is assumed to be for good reason.
Very good post. Great points. Enjoyed reading your post!
ReplyDelete